医院感染监测数据真实性评估:基于随机抽样的发病与漏报研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R181.3+2

基金项目:

江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(202210218)


Assessment of the authenticity of healthcare-associated infection survei-llance data: a random sampling study on incidence and underreporting
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析医院感染病例漏报现状,识别高漏报科室与感染类型。方法 基于分阶段随机抽样设计,回顾性调查江西省某三级甲等综合医院分院区所有临床科室2024年2月1日—12月31日的出院患者。由医院感染管理专职人员判定医院感染与漏报病例,比较分析医院感染与漏报病例特征。结果 共调查12 106例患者,覆盖全院33个临床科室。确诊医院感染病例157例,发病率为1.30%;其中漏报病例77例,漏报率为49.04%。不同科室医院感染发病率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),ICU发病率最高(20.56%)。不同科室医院感染漏报率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),外科漏报率最高(82.05%)。157例医院感染病例中,主要感染部位为下呼吸道(76例,48.41%)、血液(24例,15.29%)、泌尿道(14例,8.92%)等。不同感染部位漏报率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.173)。手术部位感染漏报率为83.33%,皮肤软组织感染漏报率为66.67%。结论 医院感染漏报问题突出,亟需强化医生对医院感染的定义、诊断及上报的认知,优化监测流程,协调疾病诊断相关分组绩效管理与上报激励,提升医院感染监测数据真实性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the current status of underreporting of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) cases, identify high underreporting departments and infection types. Methods Based on multi-stage random sampling design, a retrospective survey was conducted on discharged patients from all clinical departments of the branch of a tertiary first-class general hospital in Jiangxi Province from February 1 to December 31, 2024. The occurrence and underreporting of HAI cases were judged by HAI management professionals, characteristics of HAI and underreported HAI cases were compared and analyzed. Results A total of 12 106 patients were surveyed, covering 33 clinical departments throughout the hospital. 157 cases of HAI were confirmed, the incidence was 1.30%; Among them, there were 77 underreported cases, with an underreporting rate of 49.04%. The incidence of HAI among different departments was statistically different (P<0.001), with intensive care unit (ICU) having the highest incidence (20.56%). The underreporting rate of HAI among different departments was statistically different (P<0.001), with the department of surgery having the highest underreporting rate (82.05%). Among the 157 HAI cases, the main infection sites were the lower respiratory tract (n=76, 48.41%), blood (n=24, 15.29%), and urinary tract (n=14, 8.92%), et al. There was no statistically significant difference in the underreporting rate of different infection sites (P=0.173). The underreporting rate of surgical site infection as well as skin and soft tissue infection were 83.33% and 66.67%, respectively. Conclusion The problem of underreporting of HAI is prominent, and it is urgent to strengthen doctors’ cognition on the definition, diagnosis, and reporting of HAI, optimize surveillance processes, coordinate performance management and reporting incentives for disease diagnosis-related group, and improve the authenticity of HAI surveillance data.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

周芸,向天新,罗亭,等.医院感染监测数据真实性评估:基于随机抽样的发病与漏报研究[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2026,25(3):402-406. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20267408.
ZHOU Yun, XIANG Tianxin, LUO Ting, et al. Assessment of the authenticity of healthcare-associated infection survei-llance data: a random sampling study on incidence and underreporting[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2026,25(3):402-406. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20267408.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 摘要阅读次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-27
  • 出版日期: 2026-03-28