运用HFMEA结合环节质量强化管理对呼吸重症监护病房VAP防控效果的研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R181.3+2

基金项目:

湖北省自然科学基金立项项目(2022CFB176)


Effect of HFMEA combined with enhanced link quality management on prevention and control of ventilator-associated pneumonia in respiratory intensive care unit
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨医疗失效模式与效应分析(HFMEA)结合环节质量强化管理作为联合策略对呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的防控效果,为优化临床感染控制流程提供依据。方法 采用回顾性研究方法,对照组选取2023年1—12月武汉市肺科医院RICU接受常规管理进行VAP防控的有创机械通气患者;试验组选取2024年1—12月同一医院、同一科室采用HFMEA联合环节质量强化管理进行VAP防控的同类患者。比较两组患者的VAP防控关键环节质量评分、防控措施依从率、VAP发病率及不同管理模式下医务人员满意度等方面的差异。结果 对照组129例患者,机械通气日1 526 d;试验组161例患者,机械通气日1 409 d。VAP防控关键环节质量评分总分对照组为(60.15±5.52)分,试验组为(90.00±4.05)分;试验组总分及各环节质量评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。VAP防控核心措施依从率对照组为62.64%,试验组为85.09%;试验组总依从率及各项措施的依从率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。试验组患者的平均机械通气时间为(8.75±4.20) d,较对照组的(11.83±5.80) d缩短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。试验组VAP发病率为9.23‰,对照组为19.00‰,差异有统计学意义(P=0.026)。试验组医护人员工作满意度为93.94%,对照组为72.73%,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.007),且试验组"非常满意"比率更高(27.27% VS 15.15%)及"不满意"比率更低(6.06% VS 27.27%)。结论 运用HFMEA结合环节质量强化管理的联合策略,有助于提升VAP防控措施的执行效能,降低VAP发病率,并提升医务人员对VAP防控的满意度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the effect of healthcare failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) combined with enhanced link quality management as a strategy on the prevention and control of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), and provide evidence for optimizing clinical infection control processes. Methods A retrospective study was conducted. Invasively mechanically ventilated RICU patients who received routine prevention and control of VAP in Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital from January to December 2023 were selected as the control group. Patients who underwent HFMEA combined with enhanced link quality management for VAP prevention and control in RICU of the same hospital from January to December 2024 were selected as the trial group. Differences in quality score of VAP prevention and control key links, compliance rate of prevention and control measures, VAP incidence, and satisfaction of healthcare workers (HCWs) under different management modes between the two groups of patients were compared. Results The control group consisted of 129 patients who received mechanical ventilation for 1 526 days, and the trial group consisted of 161 patients who received mechanical ventilation for 1 409 days. The total score for the quality assessment of key links in VAP prevention and control was (60.15±5.52) points for the control group and (90.00±4.05) points for the trial group. The total score and quality score of each link quality in the trial group were all higher than those in the control group, and differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). The compliance rate of VAP prevention and control core measures was 62.64% in the control group and 85.09% in the trial group. The overall compliance rate and compliance rate of various measures in the trial group were all higher than those in the control group, and differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). The average mechanical ventilation time of patients in the trial group was (8.75±4.20) days, which was shorter than (11.83±5.80) days of the control group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The incidences of VAP in trial group and control group were 9.23‰ and 19.00‰, respectively, difference was statistically significant (P=0.026). The job satisfaction rate of HCWs in the trial group was 93.94%, while that in the control group was 72.73%, with statistically significant difference (P=0.007). Meanwhile, the trial group had a higher percentage of "very satisfied" (27.27% vs 15.15%) and a lower percentage of "dissatisfied" (6.06% vs 27.27%). Conclusion The joint strategy of HFMEA combined with enhanced link quality management can help to improve the implementation efficiency of VAP prevention and control measures, reduce the incidence of VAP, and enhance the satisfaction of HCWs towards VAP prevention and control.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

李国飞,钟小锋,王舒扬,等.运用HFMEA结合环节质量强化管理对呼吸重症监护病房VAP防控效果的研究[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2026,25(1):68-75. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20262687.
LI Guofei, ZHONG Xiaofeng, WANG Shuyang, et al. Effect of HFMEA combined with enhanced link quality management on prevention and control of ventilator-associated pneumonia in respiratory intensive care unit[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2026,25(1):68-75. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20262687.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 摘要阅读次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-28
  • 出版日期: 2026-01-28