不同感染来源对继发性血流感染患者死亡风险的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R515.3 R181.3+2

基金项目:

江苏省科协青年科技人才托举工程(卫生健康领域)(JSTJ-2023-WJ006);中华预防医学会医院感染学科发展青年人才托举项目(CPMA-HAIC-2024012900108);江苏省人民医院第三期优秀中青年人才培养项目(YNRCQN0314);南京医科大学第一附属医院青年基金培育计划(PY2022017)


Impact of different infection sources on the mortality risk of patients with secondary bloodstream infection
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析不同感染来源对继发性血流感染患者死亡风险的影响,为继发性血流感染的精准防控与诊治提供参考。方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法,回顾性收集南京医科大学第一附属医院2020年1月—2024年12月的340例继发性血流感染患者临床资料,根据感染来源分为腹腔感染组、下呼吸道感染组、泌尿道感染组和其他感染组,采用COX回归模型分析不同感染来源对继发性血流感染患者死亡风险的影响。结果 继发性血流感染来源由高到低依次为腹腔感染(135例,39.71%)、下呼吸道感染(105例,30.88%)、泌尿道感染(68例,20.00%)及其他感染(32例,9.41%)。不同感染来源继发性血流感染的病死率由高到低依次为下呼吸道感染(59.05%)、其他感染(34.38%)、腹腔感染(27.41%)和泌尿道感染(10.29%)。多因素COX回归分析结果显示下呼吸道感染来源继发性血流感染患者的死亡风险高于腹腔感染来源[HR=2.22,95%CI(1.34~3.67),P=0.002]、泌尿道感染来源[HR=4.10,95%CI(1.79~9.40),P<0.001]以及其他感染来源[HR=2.26,95%CI(1.01~5.04),P=0.046]。结论 不同感染来源的继发性血流感染患者死亡风险存在差异,其中下呼吸道感染来源高于腹腔感染、泌尿道感染和其他感染来源。加强对下呼吸道感染及多重耐药菌感染防控,重视下呼吸道感染来源的继发性血流感染诊治,有助于降低患者死亡风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the impact of different infection sources on the mortality risk of patients with secondary bloodstream infection (BSI), and provide reference for precise prevention and treatment for secondary BSI. Methods Clinical data of 340 patients with secondary BSI at the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2024 were collected for a retrospective cohort study. According to the sources of infection, patients were divided into abdominal infection group, lower respiratory tract infection group, urinary tract infection group, and other infection group. The impact of different infection sources on the mortality risk of patients with secondary BSI was analyzed using COX regression model. Results The sources of secondary BSI from high to low were abdominal infection (n=135, 39.71%), lower respiratory tract infection (n=105, 30.88%), urinary tract infection (n=68, 20.00%), and other infection (n=32, 9.41%). The mortality of secondary BSI from different infection sources from high to low were as follows: lower respiratory tract infection (59.05%), other infection (34.38%), abdominal infection (27.41%), and urinary tract infection (10.29%). Multivariate COX regression analysis result showed that patients with secondary BSI from lower respiratory tract infection had a higher risk of mortality than those from abdominal infection (HR=2.22, 95% CI [1.34-3.67], P=0.002), urinary tract infection (HR=4.10, 95% CI [1.79-9.40], P<0.001), and other infection sources (HR=2.26, 95% CI [1.01-5.04], P=0.046). Conclusion There are differences in the mortality risk of patients with secondary BSI from different infection sources. Lower respiratory tract infection is higher than abdominal infection, urinary tract infection, and other infection sources. Strengthening the prevention and control of lower respiratory tract infection and multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection, and paying attention to the diagnosis and treatment of secondary BSI from lower respiratory tract infection source can help to reduce the mortality risk of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

郦钰超,郭兴,杨惠敏,等.不同感染来源对继发性血流感染患者死亡风险的影响[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2026,25(1):91-99. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20267398.
LI Yuchao, GUO Xing, YANG Huimin, et al. Impact of different infection sources on the mortality risk of patients with secondary bloodstream infection[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2026,25(1):91-99. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20267398.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 摘要阅读次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-28
  • 出版日期: 2026-01-28