单侧椎间孔入路病灶清除术治疗胸腰椎椎间隙感染的疗效分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R681.5+1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFA0112104)


Efficacy of debridement via unilateral intervertebral foraminal approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar intervertebral infection
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨经单侧椎间孔入路行病灶清除、病椎单节段固定治疗胸腰椎椎间隙感染的临床疗效及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月—2022年1月收治的116例胸腰椎椎间隙感染患者的临床资料。根据手术方式分为A、B两组,A组(49例)采用单侧椎间孔入路病灶清除联合病椎单节段固定术,B组(67例)采用后路全椎板切除病灶清除植骨融合内固定术。比较两组患者的临床及影像学结果。结果 两组患者在性别、年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、累及节段及病原学构成方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。A组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及住院费用均低于B组(均P<0.05)。两组患者椎间融合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示,视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分均存在显著时间效应(均P<0.001),提示两组患者术后疼痛及功能状态均较术前明显改善;三项评分的分组效应及分组×时间交互效应均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),提示两组总体疗效及随时间变化趋势差异不明显。两组患者美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级及神经功能改善情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 对于符合手术适应证的胸腰椎椎间隙感染患者,经单侧椎间孔入路病灶清除联合病椎单节段固定术可获得与后路全椎板切除病灶清除植骨融合内固定术相近的临床疗效和安全性,同时具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后住院时间短及住院费用低等优势,可作为一种创伤较小的后路手术选择。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of debridement via unilateral intervertebral foraminal approach combined with single-segment fixation of the diseased spines in treating thoracolumbar intervertebral infection. Methods Clinical data of 116 patients who received treatment for thoracolumbar intervertebral infection from January 2013 to January 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach. Group A (n=49) underwent debridement via unilateral intervertebral foraminal approach combined with single-segment fixation of the diseased vertebra, while group B (n=67) underwent debridement via posterior total laminectomy and bone graft fusion combined with internal fixation. Clinical and imaging results of two groups of patients were compared. Results No significant differences were found between the two groups in sex, age, body mass index, affected segment, and pathogenic distribution (all P>0.05). Group A had shorter operative duration, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower hospitalization costs than group B (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in intervertebral fusion time between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed significant time effect for visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) (all P<0.001), indicating postoperative pain and functional status in both groups of patients improved markedly compared with preoperative status. The group effect and group × time interaction effect for these scores were not statistically significant (all P>0.05), suggesting the differences in overall efficacy and changing trend over time between the two groups were not significant. There was no statistically significant diffe-rence in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading and neurological function improvement between the two groups of patients (both P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with thoracolumbar intervertebral infection who meet the surgical indications, debridement via unilateral intervertebral foraminal approach combined with single-segment fixation of the diseased vertebra can achieve similar clinical efficacy and safety to debridement via posterior total laminectomy and bone graft fusion combined with internal fixation. At the same time, it has the advantages of shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower hospitalization costs, and may serve as a less invasive posterior surgical approach.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

朱竞辉,吴建煌,吴天定.单侧椎间孔入路病灶清除术治疗胸腰椎椎间隙感染的疗效分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2026,25(7):1014-1020. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20263386.
ZHU Jinghui, WU Jianhuang, WU Tianding. Efficacy of debridement via unilateral intervertebral foraminal approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar intervertebral infection[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2026,25(7):1014-1020. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20263386.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 摘要阅读次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-27
  • 出版日期: 2026-07-28